Two writ petitions concerning withdrawal of regularization of service were dismissed for non-prosecution, as no one appeared for the petitioners despite the case being called out twice and the impugned order had not been stayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
202 D ate of decision: 14.08.2024
CWP No.490 3 of 2000 Hari Kishan v s . State of Haryana and ors. CWP No.490 4 of 2000 Dharambir Si n gh vs. State of Haryana and ors .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: N one for the petitioner.
M s. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana. M r. Madan Lal Malwinder, Advocate for respondent No.3. * ***** *
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) 14.08.2024 JUDGE ashok W hether speaking/reasoned : Y es/No W hether reportable : Y es/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2024.08.14 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Hari Kishan
Dharambir Singh
State of Haryana
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
