Service matter filed in 2000 seeking appointment and promotion relief. Petitioners failed to produce attested appointment and promotion orders as directed; court observed the claim may not survive due to lapse of time and disposed of the petition with liberty to seek revival.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
205
CWP-1511-2000 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.08.2024
C.H.Goyal and others ...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: None for the petitioners.
Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
13.08.2024 Hemant
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
HAMANT 2024.08.13 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
C.H. Goyal and others
State of Haryana and others
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
