Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to file process fee to serve unserved respondents, with liberty reserved to seek revival if need arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
221
CWP-2646-2022 Date of decision: 13.08.2024
Raj Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : None for the petitioner.
Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
2. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the
present case.
3. Dismissed for non-prosecution, reserving the liberty to the petitioner to get it revived, in case need arises.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
13.08.2024 Hemant
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
HAMANT 2024.08.13 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Raj Singh
State of Haryana
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
