Writ petition disposed of as infructuous on the petitioner's counsel's contention that it had been rendered so.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:057623
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.: 107 Suman Kumari
Civil Writ Petition No.3189 of 2024 Date of Decision: April 29, 2024
..... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Haryana & another
..... RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
PRESENT : - Mr. Tejpal Singh Dhull, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
. . .
Tribhuvan Dahiya, J (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petition has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of as such.
(Tribhuvan Dahiya) Judge April 29, 2024 avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned: Yes/ No Whether Reportable: Yes/ No
AVIN KUMAR 2024.04.29 14:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.
Suman Kumari
State of Haryana
Tribhuvan Dahiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
