Writ petition withdrawn by the petitioner; the High Court granted permission and dismissed it as withdrawn without recording any substantive decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
����������������
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
202
CWP No.7210 of 2020 Date of Decision : 26.4.2024
Yogesh Mohan
..... Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present: Mr. Shubham Pathania, Advocate, for Mr. Prateek Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr. Rohit Arya, DAG, Haryana
Mr. Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate, for respondents no.2 and 3
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J. (ORAL):
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw
the petition.
Permission is granted.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE
26.4.2024
Ashwani
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Ashwani Kumar 2024.04.26 18:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Yogesh Mohan
State of Haryana
Tribhuvan Dahiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
