Petitioner, dismissed from service following conviction under Section 15 NDPS Act with 10-year sentence not set aside on appeal, sought quashing of dismissal and appellate orders. Court noted the conviction stood; no one appeared for petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
376
CWP-2211-2002 Date of Decision : 30.05.2024
SURINDER SINGH … PETITIONER
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr.S.S.Aulakh, AAG, Punjab.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
4. Dismissed.
30.05.2024
anju
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Anju Goel 2024.05.30 15:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a government employee convicted under Section 15 NDPS Act and dismissed from service could have his dismissal order set aside in writ jurisdiction?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Surinder Singh
State of Punjab and ors
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
