Petitioner dismissed from service and reinstated sought salary for the dismissal period; counsel reported petitioner had died. Court disposed of the petition with liberty to legal representatives to move an appropriate application if cause survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
307
CWP-1425-2001 Date of Decision : 30.05.2024
GURPREET SINGH … PETITIONER
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Advocate for Mr.Navkiran Singh, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr.S.S.Aulakh, AAG, Punjab.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
30.05.2024
anju
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Anju Goel 2024.05.30 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Gurpreet Singh
State of Punjab
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
