Petitioner sought direction to re-issue his passport after deleting his wife's name, relying on a Family Court divorce decree. Union of India's counsel undertook that the competent authority would consider the case in view of the decree and pass an appropriate order within eight weeks. Petition disposed of on consent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.12299 of 2024 Date of Decision:30.05.2024
Dalbir Singh
….Petitioner
vs.
Union of India and another
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Rishi Pal Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Arihant Goyal, Senior Panel Counsel for the Union of India
***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.30 03:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP No.12299 of 2024 -2-
disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
30.05.2024
paramjit
| Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes | |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable: | No |
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.30 03:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondents should re-issue petitioner's passport after deleting his wife's name following a divorce decree?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dalbir Singh
Union of India
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
