Petitioner sought direction to re-issue his expired passport, which he lost; he had been convicted in one FIR, acquitted in another, and a third FIR was quashed. On statements of both sides, petition disposed of directing petitioner to appear before passport authority with documents for appropriate order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
102
����������������� CWP No.1948 of 2024 Date of Decision:11.03.2024
Jatinder Singh @ Sonu
….Petitioner
vs.
Union of India and others
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Anmol Jeevan Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Ashutosh Dhankar, Advocate for Union of India
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab
***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
CWP No.1948 of 2024 -2- 2024:PHHC:033932
months and paid fine. This Court vide order dated 04.03.2009 passed in CRM-M- 1570 of 2008 has quashed FIR No. 178 of 28.07.2007.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
11.03.2024 paramjit
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.03.11 03:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, with prior criminal history including a conviction and quashed FIRs, was entitled to re-issuance of an expired passport.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jatinder Singh @ Sonu
Union of India and others
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
