Writ petition challenging reduction of the petitioner's pay scale upon refixation. None appeared for the petitioner when the case was called twice, and the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
428
CWP-12256-2001 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.05.2024
Dalbir Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
GNDU and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab.
AMAN CHAUDHARY. J (Oral)
3. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite the case having been called out twice.
4. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the
present case.
5. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
28.05.2024 Hemant
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
HAMANT 2024.05.30 09:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Dalbir Singh
GNDU
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
