Petitioner sought quashing of an order of reinstatement. Court dismissed the petition as the impugned order was not stayed and the issue no longer survives due to efflux of time, though liberty to revive is granted.
The petition was disposed of with liberty to get it revived if need arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
315 CWP-1 8 61-2001 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.05.2024
Krishan Parka s h Chopra .. P etitioner
Versus
State of Punja b and another .. R espondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: M r. RS Bajaj, Advocate for the p e titioner.
M r. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punja b
S i nce the prayer made in the present petition was for quashing of the order dated 15.01.2001, whereby the petiti o ner was reverted, however, w h ile issuing notice of motion, the said order had n o t been stayed and by efflux of t i me the issue wou l d no longer be surviving, as s u ch the present petition is disp o sed of, albeit with liberty to the petitioner to get it revived, in case need arises.
( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) 27.05.2024 JUDGE ashok W hether speaking/reasoned : Y es/No W hether reportable : Y es/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2024.05.27 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Krishan Parkash Chopra
State of Punjab
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
