Petition regarding selection/recruitment marks was disposed of after the State's reply admitted the petitioner's qualification marks but stated she could not be selected being lower in merit; liberty granted to seek revival if need arises.
Liberty reserved to petitioner to get the petition revived in case need arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
427
CWP-12198-2001 Date of decision: 28.05.2024
Narinder Kaur ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab.
AMAN CHAUDHARY. J (Oral)
thus:
“Admitted to the extent that the petitioner passed the Matriculation examination in first division and as per guidelines she has been awarded extra 2 marks for her first division. (10 for Metric and 2 for first division). In the present case the petitioner secured only 14 marks on the basis of her qualification and performance shown in the interview and could not be selected being lower in the merit.”
2. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of,
reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case need arises.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 28.05.2024 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
HAMANT 2024.05.30 19:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Narinder Kaur
State of Punjab
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
