Criminal revision challenging dismissal of petitioners' interim maintenance application. As the underlying main maintenance petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was dismissed by the Family Court on 06.09.2024, counsel conceded infructuousness; the court disposed the revision as infructuous, reserving the right to challenge the later dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRR(F)-68-2020 (O&M) - 1-
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
221 CRR(F)-68-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.11.2024
Suman and others
...Petitioner(s)
Versus
Sudhir Pannu
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Advocate for the petitioners.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (Oral)
Challenge in the present criminal revision petition under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. is for setting aside and reversing the impugned order dated 31.10.2019 passed in case No. MNT 75-2019 dated 26.4.2018/14.2.2019 whereby the application of the petitioners for grant of interim maintenance was dismissed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jind.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such, as the main petition filed by the petitioners under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has been dismissed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jind vide order dated 06.09.2024. A copy of the said order has been handed over in Court today which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the right of the petitioners to challenge the order dated 06.09.2024 may be reserved. Ordered accordingly.
DIVYANSHI 2024.11.07 11:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRR(F)-68-2020 (O&M) - 2-
Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
05.11.2024 (NIDHI GUPTA) Divyanshi JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
DIVYANSHI 2024.11.07 11:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim maintenance revision could proceed given dismissal of the main Section 125 Cr.P.C. petition.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Suman and others
Sudhir Pannu
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
