The High Court, on the submission that the applicant had expired, disposed of the Criminal Miscellaneous Application without further ado.
The Criminal Miscellaneous Application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE H IGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
214 CR M -A-1744-MA-2016
Dat e of Decision: 05.11.2024
Sat Narain .… Applicant
Versus
Shaktiraj a n d others .... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. K.S. Brar, Advocate for Mr. Ajaivir Singh, Advocate f or the applicant.
Mr. Arun Kumar Goyat, Adv o cate for respondents No. 1 to 3.
Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, H aryana.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant on instruction s submits that the applicant i n the present case has expired, therefore, t he present Criminal Miscellan e ous Application, seeking leave to file app e al against the judgment of acq u ittal dated 06.08.2016, may be disposed o f , as such.
Ordered accordingly.
05.11.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2024.11.05 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
Sat Narain
Shaktiraj and others
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
