Petitioners challenged maintenance award under Section 125 Cr.P.C.; counsel unable to contact petitioners and notices unserved; revision dismissed as petitioners were presumed not interested in pursuing it. Pending applications also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRR(F)-40-2019 (O&M) -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
229
CRR(F)-40-2019 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 08.08.2024
Kuldeep Kaur and another
.… Petitioners
Versus
Jasvir Singh
.... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. GS Dhillon, Legal Aid Counsel for the petitioners.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
By way of filing the present revision, the petitioners have laid challenge to the order dated 06.02.2018, passed by the learned District Judge (Family Court) SBS Nagar, in a proceeding under Sections 125 Cr.P.C., whereby the petitioners herein have been awarded final maintenance @ Rs.2000/- per month each, besides a sum of Rs.3000/towards litigation expenses.
Perusal of the orders sheets shows that the matter pertains to the year 2019 and notice of motion was issued vide order dated 24.01.2019, passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Thereafter, when this case was listed for hearing on 09.08.2023, following order was passed by this Court:-
“Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that as per office report, dasti notice issued to the respondent has not been received back. Learned counsel
RISHU KATARIA 2024.08.13 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
CRR(F)-40-2019 (O&M)
-2-
submits that he is not in touch with the petitioners and he even wrote a registered letter to the petitioner on 03.08.2022, however, the petitioner has still not responded to the same.
In the interest of justice, adjourned to 14.02.2024.
Pursuant thereto, fresh notices have been issued to both the
parties and as per office report fresh notices issued to both the parties have not received back either served or otherwise.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has not been able to establish contact with the petitioners till date, therefore, he has no instructions in the present case.
In view of the above, it can safely be presumed that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the instant revision petition and this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the same.
Ordered accordingly.
Pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed.
08.08.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2024.08.13 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kuldeep Kaur
Jasvir Singh
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
