Petition dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner on multiple adjourned dates and the petitioner appeared to no longer be interested in pursuing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
115
Criminal Misc. No. M-2864 of 2024 Date of decision :-07.08.2024
Simerjeet Kaur
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
…..Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:None for the petitioner.
Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Order sheets show that on 19 . 1.2024, learned counsel for the petitioner had sought time to place on reco r d copies of latest order passed by learne d trial Court and the case was a d journed to 26.02.2024 by coordinate B ench of this Court. On 26.2.20 2 4, proxy counsel appeared on behalf o f arguing counsel for the peti t ioner and had also sought adjournm e nt and ultimately the case was adjourned to 06.5.2024. On 06.5.2024 , there was no representation on b e half of petitioner and the case was adjo u rned for today i.e. 07.8.2024. E v en today nobody on behalf of petitioner is present to pursue this petition. I t seems that the petitioner is no more inte r ested to pursue the present petitio n .
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
August 0 7 , 2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
Whether sp e aking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Re p ortable Yes / No
VIJAY ASIJA 2024.08.09 20.00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Simerjeet Kaur
State of Punjab
another
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
