Petition withdrawn as counsel was unable to establish contact with the petitioner; State reported that a police cancellation report had been prepared after investigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
237
CRM-M-16292-2019
Date of Decision: 07.08.2024
Harish Kumar Arya .… Petitioner
Versus
Sate of Haryana and another .... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. H.S. Rana, Advocate for Mr. V.P. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. S.S. Nain, Advocate for respondent No. 2.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, at this stage, as he is unable to establish contact with the petitioner.
On instructions from ASI Naresh, learned counsel for the State has informed that in the present case, after completion of investigation, cancellation report has been prepared by the police on 05.09.2020.
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as
withdrawn, at this stage.
07.08.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2024.08.12 13:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
Harish Kumar Arya
Sate of Haryana
respondent No. 2
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
