Petitioner challenged the Family Court's order dismissing her application under Section 125 Cr.P.C.; counsel stated the main petition before the trial court had been decided and sought disposal as infructuous. The High Court accordingly disposed of the revision and pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
228
Criminal Revision (F) No.238 of 2022 Date of decision :-24.10.2024
Gurdeep Kaur
…..Petitioner
Versus
Mohan Singh
…..Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:Mr. G.S. Bains, Advocate fo r Mr. G.S. Jagpal, Advocate for the petitioner.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Challenge in the present p e tition is to the order dated 29.10.20 2 1 passed by learned Addl. Pri n cipal Judge, Family Court, Ludhian a dismissed the application fi l ed by the petitioner under Section 1 2 5 Cr.P.C.
At the very outset, learne d counsel for the petitioner informs t h at the present petition has bee n rendered infructuous as the main pet i tion before the learned trial C ourt has been decided and prays tha t the present petition be dispose d of accordingly.
Ordered accordingly.
Pending application(s), if an y , shall stands disposed of.
October 2 4, 2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
Whether sp e aking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Re p ortable Yes / No
VIJAY ASIJA 2024.10.25 17.33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gurdeep Kaur
Mohan Singh
Nidhi Gupta
Vijay Asija
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
