Today, at the very outset, lea r ned counsel for the petitioners submits th a t he does not want to press th e present petition on merits qua petitioner N o. 1-wife, however, limits his p rayer only to the extent that the final maintenance @ ₹8,000/- per mont h already awarded to petitioner No. 2-min o r son may be granted from t h e date of filing of application under Sec t ion 125 Cr.P.C. i.e. 31.08.2015 and not from the date of passing of final order i.e. 27.02.2019 (An n exure P-1) by the learned trial Court. It is also admitted that petitio n er No. 1-wife is a practising Advocate a t the District Courts at Charkhi Dadri. Further, it is pointed out that respo n dent-husband is a Governme n t Employee in the Electricity Departme n t and in the year 2018 his m onthly salary was ₹42,000/-; presently, h e is drawing a monthly salary o f ₹65,000/- approximately per month; an d that he also owns 04 acres of land; and has no liability. It is accordingl y , reiterated that the instant pe t ition may be disposed of with the modifi c ation in the impugned order da t ed 27.02.2019 to the effect that the final maintenance @ ₹8000/- per mon t h already awarded to petitioner No. 2-min o r son may be ordered to be p aid w.e.f. the date of filing of petition un d er Section 125 Cr.P.C. i.e. 31. 0 8.2015.
