Petition under Section 482 CrPC sought quashing of a revisional order and conditional warrants in a matrimonial matter; counsel submitted the petition was rendered infructuous due to amicable settlement between the parties, and the court disposed of it accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-7693-2020 (O&M) - 1-
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
214 CRM-M-7693-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.11.2024
Neeraj Manchanda ...Petitioner(s)
Versus
Latika Manchanda and another
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: Mr. Govind Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (Oral)
Prayer in the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is for quashing of the impugned order dated 04.05.2019 (Annexure P-6) passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh, whereby the revision petition filed by respondent No.1 against the order dated 21.08.2018 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh, has been allowed. Further prayer is for quashing of the order dated 24.01.2020 (Annexure P-8) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh, whereby conditional warrants have been issued to the petitioner for 24.02.2020 in MNT125-26-2018, dated 22.01.2018, CNR No. CHCH0300105022018, titled as “Latika Manchanda Vs. Neeraj Manchanda etc”.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such as the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.
DIVYANSHI 2024.11.11 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-7693-2020 (O&M) - 2-
Ordered accordingly.
Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
08.11.2024 (NIDHI GUPTA) Divyanshi JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
DIVYANSHI 2024.11.11 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Neeraj Manchanda
Latika Manchanda
Another respondent
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
