Disposed

Sxxxxx Mxxxx v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC11 Nov 2024CRM-M/20593/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an order in a petition under Section 482 CrPC filed under the POCSO Act regarding a Cancellation Report filed by the SHO. Counsel for the petitioner sought disposal with liberty. The High Court disposed of the pending petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

The pending petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate remedy.

Sxxxxx Mxxxx Vs State of Haryana and… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

CRM-M-20593-2024 (O&M) - 1-

¶2

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

115 CRM-M-20593-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.11.2024

SXXXXX MXXXX

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others

¶8

...Respondent(s)

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA

¶10

Present: Mr. Shubhkarman Singh Sandhu, Advocate for Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Surinder Kumar Dagar, DAG, Haryana.

¶12

¶13

NIDHI GUPTA, J. (Oral)

¶14

Prayer in the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for taking appropriate action in FIR No. 299 dated 28.12.2023 (Annexure P-5) under Sections 10, 12 of POCSO Act, 2012 registered at Police Station Sector 9 Ambala City District Ambala filed by the petitioner against respondent No.5-Sukhmandar Singh.

¶15

At the very outset, learned counsel for the State refers to the submissions made in para 12 of the status report dated 22.05.2024 filed by way of an affidavit of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, HQS, Ambala District Ambala on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4 wherein it is stated as under:-

¶16

“12. That on the same day, i.e. on dated 20.01.2024, SHO Police Station Sector 9, Ambala City also verified the facts of present case and finds that no case is made out against the Respondent no.5 and the allegations levelled by the complainant/petitioner against him were not proved on the case file, hence, on dated 28.01.2024, the Cancellation

¶17

DIVYANSHI 2024.11.12 15:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

CRM-M-20593-2024 (O&M) - 2-

¶19

Report has been prepared in the present matter and would be submitted before the Ld. Court of Illaqua Magistrate after approval of higher police officials.”

¶20

In view of the same, learned proxy counsel for the petitioner

¶21

submits that the present petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the appropriate remedy, as per law.

¶22

Ordered accordingly.

¶23

Pending application(s), stand(s) disposed of.

¶24

11.11.2024 (NIDHI GUPTA) Divyanshi JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No

¶25

DIVYANSHI 2024.11.12 15:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Sxxxxx Mxxxx v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sxxxxx Mxxxx v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neeraj Manchanda Vs Latika Manchanda and Anr.

Jit Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Another

Gurpreet Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others

Renu and Anr. Vs Anil Kumar Phogat

Sanjeev Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Another

Sandeep Vs State of Haryana and Another