Petition sought quashing of an FIR under Section 324 IPC on the basis of a partial compromise. Following a Larger Bench ruling that partial compromises are not permissible, counsel withdrew the petition with liberty to reapproach if a full compromise is reached.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
155 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.64904 of 2024(O&M) Date of Decision:20.12.2024
Kashmir Singh and others …Petitioners v/s State of Punjab and another …Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: M r . Munish Garg, Advocate fo r the petitioners. ********
KULDEEP TIWARI J. (ORAL)
(KULDEEP TIWARI) December 20, 2024 JUDGE Pankaj*
(i) W h ether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) W h ether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2024.12.20 15:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kashmir Singh and others
State of Punjab
another
Kuldeep Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
