High Court dismissed petition seeking quashing of FIR on partial compromise basis, citing Larger Bench ruling that partial compromise is not permissible for such offenses under law.
None; petition dismissed with liberty to reassess with full and final compromise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
249 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.16000 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:19.12.2024
Pappu @ Tota and others …Petitioners
v/s State of Punjab and others …Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI
Present: M r . Naveen Kumar, Advocate fo r the petitioners.
M r . Rubal Pawar, AAG, Punjab.
M r . Imran Farooqi, Advocate fo r respondents No.2 & 3.
KULDEEP TIWARI J. (ORAL)
the parties co n cerned.
(KULDEEP TIWARI) December 19, 2024 JUDGE Pankaj* (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii ) Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2024.12.20 15:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether quashing of FIR on basis of partial compromise is permissible considering Larger Bench precedent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pappu @ Tota and others
State of Punjab
Kuldeep Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
