Petition sought quashing of an FIR under Sections 323, 324, 341, 148, 149 and 34 IPC based on a partial compromise. Following the Larger Bench's ruling that partial compromise is not permissible under law, the Court dismissed the petition with liberty to approach again if a full and final compromise is arrived at.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
248 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.1632 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:19.12.2024
Mandeep Singh …Petitioner v/s State of Punjab and another …Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: M r . I.S. Kooner, Advocate fo r the petitioners.
M r . Rubal Pawar, AAG, Punjab.
M s . Avneet Kaur, Advocate for M s . Shruti Sharma, Advocate fo r respondent No.2. ********
KULDEEP TIWARI J. (ORAL)
(KULDEEP TIWARI) December 19, 2024 JUDGE Pankaj* (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii ) Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2024.12.20 15:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an FIR can be quashed on the basis of a partial compromise between the parties?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mandeep Singh
State of Punjab
Respondent No.2
Kuldeep Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
