Petition seeking quashing of an FIR on the basis of a compromise was withdrawn by counsel at the outset, with liberty to approach the Court again. The Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn along with pending applications, without deciding any substantive question.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
263 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.21646 of 2024(O&M)
Date of Decision: 18.11.2024
Akash Kumar @ Kaka and Others
... Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and Another … Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Gopal Singh Nahel, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Akshay Kumar, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Sahilpreet Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J .
| FIR | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. | |||
| 43 | 11.04.2022 | City-1, Sangrur, |
341, 382, 34 IPC and 411, 120-B IPC |
| District Sangrur | added later on |
Seeking quashing of FIR captioned above, on the basis of compromise, the
petitioners had come up before this Court under Section 482, Cr.P.C.
with liberty to come to this Court again.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
18.11.2024 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No.
Sonia Puri 2024.11.19 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Akash Kumar @ Kaka and Others
State of Punjab
Respondent No.2
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
