Revision petition disposed of as infructuous after counsel stated the main case had already been decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.375
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.1021 of 2024 Date of Decision:10.12.2024 Prince Bedi .....Pe))oner Vs. Gursajan Bedi .....Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:Mr. G.S. Bawa, Advocate for the pe��oner. ****
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (Oral)
Statement is made by learned counsel for the pe��oner that the main case has since already been decided and, therefore, this pe��on has become infructuous.
In view of the afore-said statement, the present pe��on is hereby disposed of having become infructuous.
December 10, 2024 ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) renu JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RENU 2024.12.10 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Prince Bedi
Gursajan Bedi
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
