Petitioner sought setting aside of orders summoning him alone under Section 138 NI Act while dismissing summons to other partners. Counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to raise the points at trial; petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
124 CRM-M-47912-2024
Date of Decision: 24.09.2024
Rakesh Kumar ......... Pe��oner
Versus
Rakesh Kumar and others ......... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present:Mr. Dixit Garg, Advocate for the pe��oner.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
| Complaint No. | Sec0on | Title |
|---|---|---|
| NACT/23/2020 | 138NI Act | Rakesh Kumar Vs. M/s Piara Lal & Co and others |
The present pe��on has been filed under Sec�on 528 BNSS for se5ng aside the impugned order dated 02.05.2023 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Payal whereby the applica�on for summoning the other partners of respondent No. 2-firm to face the trial under Sec�on 138 of NI Act has been dismissed and se5ng aside the impugned order dated 02.02.2021 whereby only the pe��oner was summoned to face the trial under Sec�on 138 of NI Act in the above cap�oned criminal complaint.
to raise all these points during the trial before the trial Court.
liberty aforesaid. The trial Court is directed to give appropriate opportunity to the pe��oner/accused, so that he is able to raise all theses points. All pending miscellaneous applica�ons, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
24.09.2024
Jyo�-II
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
JYOTI 2024.09.25 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rakesh Kumar
Rakesh Kumar and others
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
