Allowed

Pardeep Kumar v. the State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC23 Sept 2024CRM-M/47732/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court directed the respondent authority to decide the petitioner's representation regarding an FIR within two months by passing a speaking and reasoned order. The petition was allowed with this directive.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondent No.5 to decide the representation dated 17.07.2024 within two months by passing a speaking and reasoned order.

Pardeep Kumar Vs the State of Punjab and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

CRM-M No. 47732 of 2024

¶2

125 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CRM-M No. 47732 of 2024

¶4

Date of Decision: 23.09.2024

Pardeep Kumar

...Pe��oner

Versus

State of Punjab and others …Respondents

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

¶10

Present: Mr. Harpreet S. Rakhra, Advocate and

¶11

Ms. Gurvinder Kaur, Advocate for the pe��oner.

¶12

Ms. Swa� Batra, D.A.G., Punjab.

¶13

****

¶14

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

¶15

FIR No.	Dated	Police Sta	�on	Sec�ons
63	29.03.2024	Sadar	Khanna,	420, 406 IPC
		Police	District
		Khanna

¶16

Seeking issuance of appropriate direc�ons to the official respondents to take appropriate ac�on in the FIR cap�oned above, the pe��oner has come up before this Court under Sec�on 528 BNSS.

¶17

Counsel for the pe��oner confines his prayer to the extent of deciding the representa�on of the pe��oner (Annexure P-3) in a �me bound manner.

¶18

No�ce served upon the official respondent through State counsel. The nature of order which this Court proposes to pass, there is no necessity of calling any response from the State.

¶19

State counsel submits that they would take a decision on the same within a period of three months.

¶20

In view of prayer made by counsel for the pe��oner, respondent No.5 is directed to decide representa�on dated 17.07.2024 (Annexure P-3) himself/herself or

¶21

¶22

Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.25 09:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

¶23

CRM-M No. 47732 of 2024

¶24

by delega�ng the same to any officer not below the rank of PPS, within a period of two months by passing a speaking and reasoned order and such order be also communicated to the pe��oner as well as his counsel on the e-mail ID provided to State counsel during the course of day.

¶25

There would be no need for a cer�fied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the Pe��oner and State can download this order and other relevant par�culars from the official web page of this court and a�est it to be a true copy.

¶26

Pe��on is allowed with the observa�ons men�oned above. All pending applica�ons, if any, stand disposed.

¶27

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 23.09.2024 Jyo� Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.

¶28

¶29

Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.25 09:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

Pardeep Kumar v. the State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pardeep Kumar v. the State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anuj Arora and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Others

Gurpreet Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab Anr.

Avtar Singh Vs State of Punjab

Ranjit Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Others

Manpreet Kaur and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Aruna Vs State of Punjab and Others