Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS apprehending arrest in a complaint for Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Counsel withdrew the petition in view of an order of even date in a related case, and the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
101 CRM-M-47777-2024 Date of Decision: 24.09.2024
Ravi Pal Singh ......... Pe��oner
Versus
State of Punjab and another ......... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present:Mr. G.S. Brar, Advocate for the pe��oner.
Ms. Swa� Batra, D.A.G., Punjab.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
| Complaint | Dated | Sec1on | Titled |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. | |||
| 18 | 27.01.2020 | 138 of NI Act | Mehma Singh Vs. Ravi Pal Singh |
The pe��oner apprehending the arrest in the complaint cap�oned above, has
come up before this Court under Sec�on 482 BNSS seeking an�cipatory bail.
the pe��oner wants to withdraw the present pe��on.
pending miscellaneous applica�ons, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA)
JUDGE
24.09.2024 Jyo�-II
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
JYOTI 2024.09.25 09:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ravi Pal Singh
State of Punjab
Mehma Singh
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
