Dinkar Sehgal v. Latika Sehgal
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition concerning execution of an order granting interim maintenance to the respondent. The available text is truncated mid-argument and does not record any substantive finding or final decision by the court.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-47789-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.09.2024
DINKAR SEHGAL
......PETITIONER
Vs.
LATIKA SEHGAL
.........RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN
Present:- Mr. Rajesh Kumar Moudgil, Advocate, for the petitioner.
HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that at the time when execution petition, dated 17.03.2022 (Annexure P-8) was filed for implementation of the order awarding interim maintenance to the respondent. The petition under the
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dinkar Sehgal
- respondent
Latika Sehgal
Coram
Harpreet Kaur Jeewan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/47789/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court