Petition rendered infructuous because the FIR had already been quashed by this Court in a separate earlier order. Petition disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No.284
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-19733-2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 24th September 2024
MANISHA AHUJA
........Petitioner
versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
.......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN
Present: Mr. Abhishek Nirban, Advocate for Mr. D.S. Nirban, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Davinder Bir Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab, assisted by HC Ghansham.
Mr. P.K.S. Phoolka, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5.
HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. (ORAL)
(HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN) JUDGE
24th September 2024 simran
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
SIMRANDEEP KAUR 2024.09.27 09:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
CRM-M-40326-2023Referred¶14
Manisha Ahuja
State of Punjab
Others
Harpreet Kaur Jeewan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
