Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their criminal revision petition. The court allowed the withdrawal application, took the main case up on board the same day, dismissed the main petition as withdrawn, and disposed of pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
116
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-35428-2024 IN/AND CRR(F)-994-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.09.2024
PINKI AND ANOTHER
......PETITIONERS
Vs.
UMESH
.........RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN
Present:- Mr. Gaurav Verma , Advocate, for the applicants-petitioners.
HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN J. (ORAL)
CRM-35428-2024
CRR(F)-994-2019 O&M)
disposed of.
September 23, 2024 (HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN) nitin JUDGE Whether Speaking Yes Whether reportable No
Nitin 2024.09.27 13:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Pinki
Umesh
Harpreet Kaur Jeewan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
