Petitioner withdrew the anticipatory bail petition filed under Section 482 BNSS apprehending arrest in a criminal case. The High Court disposed of the petition with liberty to file a fresh one.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
101
CRM-M-46677-2024 Date of Decision: 19.09.2024
Kamaljit Verma
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ....Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Ms. Harnaaz Kaur Hundal, Advocate and Ms. Taranjit Kaur Hundal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Swati Batra, DAG, Punjab.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| 46 | 25.06.2024 | Aur, District SBS Nagar, Punjab | 398, 452 IPC and 25 of Arms Act |
The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court by filing the present petition under Section 482 BNSS.
| (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE |
||
|---|---|---|
| 19.09.2024 | ||
| anju rani | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes | |
| Whether reportable? | No |
ANJU RANI 2024.09.20 09:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamaljit Verma
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
