The appeal against orders dismissing the main petition was disposed of as infructuous due to the petitioner's death, with liberty to revive if legal representatives so wish.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
253 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR No. 611 of 2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.09.2024
Paramjit Kaur
...Pe��oner
Versus
Suman Kapoor …Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Arjun Veer Sharma, Advocate for the pe��oner.
Mr. Chandan S. Rana, Advocate for the respondent.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
CRM-7498-2020
Allowed as prayed for.
Main case
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
18.09.2024 Jyo� Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.
1
Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.19 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal is maintainable inasmuch as the petitioner has expired.
Paramjit Kaur
Suman Kapoor
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
