Bail cancelled by Trial Court due to petitioner's absence. High Court directed petitioner to surrender within 10 days and move for regular bail, referencing prior observations that Trial Courts should take a lenient view in genuine cases of absence.
Direction to surrender within 10 days and move for regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-45455-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:-13.09.2024
Jagir Kaur … Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Naresh Kumar Jandoli, Advocate, for the petitioner.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
MOHAN SINGH 2024.09.13 13:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
CRM-M-45455-2024 (O&M)
( 2 )
as under:
| 13.09.2024 mohan |
( GURVI |
NDER SINGH GILL ) JUDGE |
|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking /reasoned Yes |
/ No | |
| Whether Reportable Yes |
/ No |
MOHAN SINGH 2024.09.13 13:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail after surrendering, following cancellation of bail for absence?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Pawan Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and anotherReferred¶13
CRM-M-39172 of 2021 titled Pawan Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and another decided on 21.9.2021
Jagir Kaur
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
