Anticipatory bail petition under NDPS Act FIR. The State informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested; counsel sought to withdraw the petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-45391-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:-12.9.2024
Baljit Singh
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Nikhil Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Siddharth Attri, AAG, Punjab, assisted by ASI Madan Singh.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Section/s |
|---|---|---|---|
| 178 | 17.8.2024 | Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur |
21(b), 29, 61, 85 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 |
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
12.9.2024 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) Pankaj Judge
Whether speaking /reasoned Whether Reportable
Yes / No Yes / No
Pankaj Kakkar 2024.09.13 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in FIR No. 178 of 17.8.2024 under the NDPS Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Baljit Singh
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
