Petitioner challenged bail cancellation order due to absence. Court directed surrender within 10 days for prompt bail consideration by Trial Court, citing leniency standards from a 2021 judgment.
Petitioner to surrender within 10 days so Trial Court may consider regular bail application expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-44075-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:-6.9.2024
Ranjodh Singh … Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Joginder Pal Devgan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
Pankaj Kakkar 2024.09.06 13:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRM-M-44075-2024 (O&M)
( 2 )
as under:
| 6.9.2024 | ( Gu | rvinder Singh Gill ) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pankaj | Judge | ||
| Whether speaking /reasoned | Yes / No | ||
| Whether Reportable | Yes / No |
Pankaj Kakkar 2024.09.06 13:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be restored given the petitioner's absence and surrender.
How trial courts should handle bail applications after the accused surrenders.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Pawan Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and anotherRelied on¶12
CRM-M-39172 of 2021
Ranjodh Singh
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
