The applicant sought anticipatory bail in an NDPS case but requested to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. The Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition on that basis.
Petition withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
109
CRM-M-44612-2024
Date of Decision: 09.09.2024
Anil ......... Pe��oner
Versus
State of Haryana ......... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present:Mr. B.S. Mamli, Advocate for the pe��oner.
Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Sr. D.A.G, Haryana. (through video conferencing).
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Sta/on | Sec/ons |
|---|---|---|---|
| 338 | 01.08.2024 | Sadar Fatehabad | 22-C/61/85 of NDPS Act |
up before this Court under Sec�on 482 BNSS, 2023 seeking an�cipatory bail.
to file fresh one with be9er par�culars.
with liberty aforesaid. All pending miscellaneous applica�ons, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA)
JUDGE
09.09.2024
Jyo�-II
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
JYOTI 2024.09.11 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Anil
State of Haryana
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
