Allowed

Christian Welfare Society v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC9 Sept 2024CRM-M/44690/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought directions to take legal action against certain officials. The Court permitted the filing of a fresh representation within 15 days and directed the State to decide it within two months, granting relief without requiring a formal response from the State.

What did the court decide?

Permitted to file fresh representation within 15 days; State directed to decide within two months.

Christian Welfare Society Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

CRM-M No. 44690 of 2024

¶2

133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CRM-M No. 44690 of 2024

¶4

Date of Decision: 09.09.2024

¶5

Chris�an Welfare Society through its Chairman ...Pe��oner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Punjab and others …Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

¶9

Present: Mr. Suram Singh Rana, Advocate Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Dipanshu Kapur, Advocate for the pe��oner.

¶10

Ms. Swa� Batra, D.A.G., Punjab (through V.C.).

¶11

****

¶12

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

¶13

Seeking issuance of appropriate direc�ons to the official respondents No.2 to 4 to take appropriate legal ac�on against respondents No.5 to 7, the pe��oner has come up before this Court under Sec�on 482 CrPC.

¶14

Counsel for the pe��oner submits that the pe��oner would be contended and sa�sfied if he is permi�ed to file a fresh representa�on before the respondent No.3 within 15 days and the concerned officer is directed to decide the same in a �me bound manner.

¶15

No�ce served upon the official respondent through State counsel. The nature of order which this Court proposes to pass, there is no necessity of calling any response from the State.

¶16

State counsel submits that they would take decision on the fresh representa�on, if any filed within a period of three months.

¶17

In view of prayer made by counsel for the pe��oner, Society is permi�ed to file fresh representa�on within 15 days men�oning its e-mail ID as well as of counsel and respondent No.3 is directed to decide the same, if filed either himself/herself or by

¶18

¶19

Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.12 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

¶20

CRM-M No. 44690 of 2024

¶21

delega�ng the same to any officer not below the rank of PPS, within a period of two months by passing a speaking and reasoned order and such order be also communicated to the Society as well as counsel on the e-mail ID provided on the representa�on.

¶22

There would be no need for a cer�fied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the Pe��oner and State can download this order and other relevant par�culars from the official web page of this court and a�est it to be a true copy.

¶23

Pe��on is allowed with the observa�ons men�oned above. All pending applica�ons, if any, stand disposed.

¶24

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 09.09.2024 Jyo� Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.

¶25

¶26

Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.12 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

Christian Welfare Society v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Christian Welfare Society v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Meena Pothireddy Vs M/S Tecno Doors Pvt. Ltd.

Meena Pothireddy Vs M/S Tecno Doors Pvt. Ltd.

Meena Pothireddy Vs M/S Tecno Doors Pvt. Ltd.

Rajesh Kumar Chauhan Vs Rakesh Sharma

Rajneesh Gupta Vs State of Punjab and Others

Shaheed Vs State of Haryana and Others