Petitioner sought regular bail under Section 439 CrPC in a cyber fraud FIR; counsel withdrew the petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars.
Petition withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
258
CRM-M-38905-2024
Date of Decision: 09.09.2024
Vishnu alias Lala
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ....Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, DAG, Haryana.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| 45 | 05.09.2022 | Cyber Dist Rohtak |
rict 201, 384, 419, 420 IPC and Sections 66(c), 66(d) of Information of Technology Act |
Petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court by filing the present petition under Section 439 CrPC.
Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
09.09.2024 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable? No
ANJU RANI 2024.09.10 09:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vishnu alias Lala
State of Haryana
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
