The petitioner sought quashing of an FIR under Section 306 IPC. The court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the petition at the current stage.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
124
CRM-M-44129-2024 Date of Decision: 06.09.2024
Sanjay Bhatt
.… Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pratham Sethi, Advocate and Mr. Angadpreet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Deepshikha Chauhan, A.A.G., Haryana.
Mr. Amandeep S. Talwar, Advocate for respondent No.2.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in this petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for quashing of FIR No. 160 dated 27.05.2024 registered under Sections 306 IPC at Police Station Faridabad NIT, District Faridabad (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent and consequential proceedings arising therefrom including the police report/challan (Annexure P-6).
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, at this stage
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage.
06.09.2024
Divyanshi
(NIDHI GUPTA) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable:
Yes/No Yes/No
DIVYANSHI 2024.09.10 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the petition for quashing of FIR?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay Bhatt
State of Haryana
another
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
