Petition filed under CRM-M jurisdiction; after argument the court declined the prayer and counsel sought permission to withdraw. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
205 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ A B AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M- 4 3173-2024 (O&M) Date of D ecision : 06.09.2024
Tinku …Petitioner
Versus State of Harya n a ….Respondent
BEFORE: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: Mr. Onkar Singh Wahla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Hary a na. ***
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Cu s tody certificate dated 06.09. 2 024 of the petitioner has bee n filed in Court today. The same is taken on reco r d.
Af t er arguing for some time, whe n this Court is not inclined to accede to the p rayer made by learned counse l for the petitioner, learned counsel for the p etitioner submits that he may b e permitted to withdraw the present petition.
Di s missed as withdrawn.
(NIDHI GUPTA) September 06, 2024 JUDGE ps Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
PUSHPINDER SAINI 2024.09.10 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Tinku
State of Haryana
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
