Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing an order was filed. Counsel agreed disputes were settled. Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
None granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE H IGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
243 CR M -M-4675-2019
Dat e of Decision: 05.09.2024
Manoj Ku m ar .… Petitioner
Versus
Ravinder S harma and another .... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. B.S. Jaswal, Advocate fo r the petitioner.
Mr. Daman Dhir, Advocate f o r respondent No. 1.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in this petition filed u n der Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing o f order dated 05.08.2017 (Anne x ure P-7) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur, wh e reby the revision filed by the petitioners against the order dated 19.11. 2 015 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learne d Sub Divisional Judicial Magist r ate, Dhuri, was dismissed.
At the very outset, learned co u nsel for the parties are ad idem that all th e disputes between the parties stand settled, as such, learned counsel fo r the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2024.09.09 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
Manoj Kumar
Ravinder Sharma
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
