Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR under Sections 323, 324, 34 IPC registered at Police Station Jaito, District Faridkot, based on a compromise between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRM-M-19444-2024 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-19444-2024 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 06.09.2024
Gurjant Singh & another ...Petitioners
Versus
State of P unjab & others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present: Mr. T.P.Singh Makkar, Adv o cate, for the petitioners. Mr. Prabhdeep Singh Dhali w al, AAG, Punjab. M/s Manish Bansal & Satna m Singh, Advocates, for respondents No.2 & 3.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral)
VIMAL KUMAR 2024.09.06 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2
CRM-M-19444-2024 (O&M)
been rec o rded to the effect that they have compromised the matte r amongst t hemselves.
06.09.2024 (GURVINDER SINGH GILL) Vimal JUDGE
Whether speaking/reason e d: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
VIMAL KUMAR 2024.09.06 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of PunjabRelied on¶6
2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gurjant Singh
Sukhmander Singh
State of Punjab
Sikander Singh
Baldev Singh
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
