Allowed

Gulshan Kumar v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC3 Sept 2024CRM-M/14048/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought quashing of bail cancellation and proclamation proceedings under an NDPS FIR. Counsel submitted he had complied with a coordinate bench order directing him to join trial proceedings; State counsel did not refute. Petition allowed and interim bail made absolute.

What did the court decide?

Interim order dated 18.03.2024 made absolute; pending applications disposed of.

Gulshan Kumar Vs State of Punjab — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

-1-

¶2

277 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CRM-M No.14048 of 2024(O&M) Date of Decision: 03.09.2024

Gulshan Kumar

... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab … Respondent

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

¶9

Present: Mr. Ketan Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr. Gauravdeep Singh Dhaliwal, AAG, Punjab.

¶11

¶12

ANOOP CHITKARA, J .

¶13

Case No.	before court of	Addl. NDPS/770 of 2018
Sessions J	udge
FIR No.	Dated	Police Station	Sections
24	03.02.2018	Machiwara,Ludhiana	15,25 of NDPS Act,1985

¶14

Seeking quashing of order dated 21.02.2024 whereby bail of the petitioner has been cancelled and bail & surety bonds have been forefeited in the FIR captioned above and also quashing of order dated 28.02.2024 whereby proclamation proceedings have been issued against the petitioner by Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, the petitioner had come up before this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has complied with order dated 18.03.2024 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court whereby the petitioner was directed to join the proceedings before the trial Court and on doing so, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail and now prays for confirmation of the interim bail granted

¶16

to the petitioner.

¶17

State counsel does not refute the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner.

¶18

Given above, the present petition is allowed and interim order dated 18.03.2024 passed by this Court, is hereby made absolute. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶19

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 03.09.2024 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No.

¶20

Sonia Puri 2024.09.05 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Gulshan Kumar v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gulshan Kumar v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Randhir Singh Alias Dhira Vs State of Punjab

Dhirender Singh Rathore Vs State of Punjab

Jagir Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Baljinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Rajvir Singh and Another Vs State of Punjab and Another

Deepak Garg Vs State of Punjab and Others