Single judge order in regular bail petition. Court directed trial court to cancel bail if accused on bail seek unnecessary adjournments and instructed State not to seek unnecessary adjournments.
Directed trial court to cancel bail of accused on bail if adjournments sought; State directed not to seek unnecessary adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
235 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.32451 of 2024(O&M) Date of Decision: 02.09.2024
Dhirender Singh Rathore
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab … Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Passi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sukhdev Singh, A.A.G., Punjab.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J .
| FIR | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. | |||
| 344 | 13.07.2020 | City Barnala, |
22 of NDPS Act (25, 29 of NDPS Act, |
| District Barnala | 1985 and 7, 13 of Prevention of | ||
| Corruption Act, 1988 and 465, 467, 468, | |||
| 471,120-B IPC,1860 added later on) |
The petitioner incarcerated for more than 04 years in the FIR captioned above had
come up before this Court under Section 439 CrPC, 1973, seeking regular bail.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 02.09.2024 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No.
Sonia Puri 2024.09.04 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Dhirender Singh Rathore
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
