Regular bail petition under Section 483 BNSS in an IPC offences FIR. The complainant's counsel pointed out a pending criminal case against the petitioner, contradicting his claim of no antecedents. Bail petition was dismissed with liberty to file afresh disclosing all criminal antecedents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-41838-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-41838-2024 (O&M) Date of order: 10.09.2024
Deepak @ Challu State of Haryana
Versus
... Petitioner(s)
…Respondent (s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present:Mr. P.S. Mirpur, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Kamil Nagpal, Advocate for the complainant.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| 406 | 22.12.2023 | Nissing, Karnal | 148, 149, 308, 323, 324, 379B, 427, 452, |
| 506 IPC |
one with same power of attorney in accordance with law after mentioning all his criminal antecedents. Any other pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE September 10, 2024 AK Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No
ASHWANI KUMAR 2024.09.11 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail in FIR No. 406 despite a pending criminal case not disclosed in the petition.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Deepak @ Challu
State of Haryana
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
