Petition under Section 438 CrPC concerning an FIR under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC; disposed of by referring to detailed orders of even date in a connected petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
CRM-M-28545-2024
213-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.28545 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.09.2024
Balwinderpal Sharma @ Balwinder Pal Kaushik and Another ...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab
…Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Ishan Gupta, Advocate with Ms. Harita Panthey, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Sukhdev Singh, A.A.G., Punjab.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J .
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | 01.05.2024 | Lehra, District Sangrur |
420, 120-B IPC |
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
12.09.2024
Sonia Puri
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.
Sonia Puri 2024.09.13 09:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1
Balwinderpal Sharma @ Balwinder Pal Kaushik
Another
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
