Petition dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner remained unrepresented on three consecutive hearings despite prior warnings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-21775-2023
2024:PHHC:119772
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-21775-2023 (O&M) Date of order: 11.09.2024
Sarif Khan
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana
…Respondent (s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present:None for the petitioner.
Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, DAG, Haryana.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
following order was passed:
“On the last date of hearing, the petitioner was absent. Even today, the petitioner is again unrepresented. List on 04.09.2024.
It is made clear that if the petitioner remained unrepresented on the next date of hearing, the petition shall be dismissed for nonprosecution.”
“On the last date hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. List on 11.09.2024. If the petitioner remained unrepresented on the next date of hearing, this Court shall dismiss the case for non-prosecution.”
any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
September 11, 2024 AK Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No
ASHWANI KUMAR 2024.09.12 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
1
Sarif Khan
State of Haryana
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
