Amanjit Singh v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana, in an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS, considered the petitioner's antecedents and the State's reply alleging active participation in car theft. The Court granted bail with strict conditions to join the investigation within seven days and refrain from tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of the arresting officer or court, subject to strict conditions of joining investigation within seven days and refrai
What the court decided
1
CRM-M-38314-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-38314-2024 Reserved on: 03.09.2024 Pronounced on: 11.09.2024
Amanjit Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab …Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sukhdev Singh, AAG, Punjab.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an theft case based on the complaint and the reply filed by the State
Whether conditions can be imposed on the petitioner to join the investigation prevent tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses
Whether the petitioner can be released on anticipatory bail subject to the payment of bond and submission of personal details
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Amanjit Singh
- respondent
State of Punjab
Coram
ANoop CHITKARA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/38314/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court